Grand Canyon Tram Slammed

Save the Confluence members stand outside the Navajo Nation Council building holding a sign that says Protect Grand Canyon Stop Grand Canyon Escalade after the final vote striking down the proposal

Roger Clark by Roger Clark, Grand Canyon Director

By a vote of 16–2, the Navajo Nation Council slammed the door on the Grand Canyon Escalade proposal for a mega-resort on the canyon’s eastern rim and a gondola down to the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado rivers.

The decisive vote came after several hours of debate. It also was the culmination of seven gut-wrenching years of opposition by Save the Confluence families and Navajo citizens, who joined Hopi, Zuni, and Acoma leaders on Tuesday, October 31, to witness the dramatic decision to kill the Escalade bill.

A harrowing Halloween debate

More than a year after council delegate Ben Bennett introduced the Escalade bill, the full Navajo Council took up the issue in a special session on Halloween. 

The debate began with proposed amendments to the bill, including:

  • Deleting the non-compete clause that would have prevented Navajo artists and vendors from selling their goods along the road corridor leading to the development
  • Deleting a 20-year, non-revocable license for Escalade partners to operate the project, thus allowing the Navajo Nation to expel the partners without notice or cause (Escalade promoter Albert Hale called this a “deal-killer”)
  • Deleting the waiver of sovereign immunity that removed legal liabilities in Navajo courts. Deleting this clause also eliminated the requirement of a two thirds vote during a regular council session to approve the bill
  • Removing the provision that project revenues be exempt from Navajo Nation taxes
  • Changing the $65 million infrastructure investment by the Navajo Nation to a loan that Escalade developers would have to repay the Nation
  • Adding a provision that Escalade developers fund the design and construction of a multi-purpose community center for the Bodaway/Gap Chapter.

Although they approved the amendments, council delegates still had concerns about what council delegate Dwight Witherspoon called the “absolutely totally one-sided” nature of the proposal and listed many remaining questions. Thankfully, a motion to table the vote for 45 days—giving Escalade partners more time to respond — was rejected.

When the Navajo Nation Council speaker ended debate and called for a vote on the revised Escalade bill, questions lingered about the veracity of promoters’ promises of revenues and jobs and the integrity of the Escalade partners themselves. Council delegates had to decide whether the amendments they had just adopted were sufficient to vote for its overall approval. At the moment of decision, overwhelming opposition to the project by Navajo citizens, chapter officials, cultural leaders, and neighboring tribes filled the council chambers.

Time slowed to a standstill as delegate votes were tallied on the overhead screen.

The bill to approve Escalade was defeated by a vote of 16–2.

Praise for Escalade’s defeat

Outside the council chambers, Save the Confluence family members cheered and praised the council’s vote.

They heard us. We needed to be a presence there to let them know we’re not going to go away. We’re going to always be here to defend our Mother, to defend our sacred sites.

–Renae Yellowhorse

The next morning, Navajo Nation President Russell Begaye said: “Our administration has opposed the development since we came into office. We have been very clear that we will not sign off any agreement for this project.” The president expressed his thanks to the council for “respecting the voice of the Navajo people,” and said his administration would continue to protect the confluence.

Other tribes praised the council’s decision too.

Hopi ​Tribal ​Chairman Herman Honanie said: “We’ve been waiting for this day and are happy with the Council’s decision to not approve this development.” The Head Councilman from the Zuni Tribal Council said: “This area of the Grand Canyon holds​cultural significance to our people. For us it’s a place of emergence and we hold the area in great reverence.”

What’s next?

According to the Associated Press, “Navajo lawmakers won’t take up the same legislation again. A new measure could be introduced and moved through Tribal Council committees, but it appears unlikely. The reservation has an election next year, and Navajo President Russell Begaye says he won’t support any agreement for the project.”

While Save the Confluence families and opponents of Escalade are celebrating this victory, they know that it and other unacceptable projects could come knocking. They will be working with residents, elected representatives, and cultural leaders on measures to protect the rights of grazing permittees, home site lease holders, and traditional practitioners, while permitting community-supported businesses that do not threaten areas of cultural and ecological concern.

Save the Confluence family members will remain vigilant. The Grand Canyon Trust honors their perseverance and leadership. We will continue supporting efforts to create respectful and sustainable solutions.

Grand Canyon Blog

12/3/24

The Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam is heating up. Find out why.

Read More
11/18/24

Groundwater pumping at a uranium mine near the Grand Canyon will affect the canyon's springs, scientists says.

Read More
10/16/24

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs is the latest elected official to call for an environmental review of Pinyon Plain uranium mine.

Read More