May 27, 2009
Contact: Nikolai Lash, Grand Canyon Trust, 928-266-5606
McCrystie Adams, Earthjustice, 303-996-9616
Court Rules Glen Canyon Dam Operations Illegal
Phoenix, AZ – A federal court has struck down federal approval of dam operations at Glen Canyon Dam. For now the dam will continue to operate as before but the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) must reconsider the extent to which the Dam’s operations damage the essential habitat for the endangered humpback chub in Grand Canyon.
“This is an important ruling for the endangered Colorado River fish and for Grand Canyon,” said Nikolai Lash, Colorado River Program Director at Grand Canyon Trust. “Finally, the federal government is being scolded for ignoring the law and years and years of science to the detriment of Grand Canyon resources.”
The court ruled in favor of Grand Canyon Trust’s Claim that FWS’s 2008 Biological Opinion illegally sidesteps the issue of whether current dam operations harm humpback chub critical habitat. The court made a strong statement in support of the Trust’s position: “The court is strongly inclined to conclude that MLFF [the current flow regime] Dam operations destroy and adversely modify chub critical habitat in violation of the Endangered Species Act.”
“Modified Low Fluctuating Flows (MLFF) have been run since 1996 and since then scientists have concluded with near-unanimity that these fluctuating flows damage endangered fish habitat, beaches, archaeological sites, and other key Grand Canyon resources,” said Rick Johnson, Colorado River Science Director for Grand Canyon Trust. As the Court recognized, "virtually all of the science contained in the administrative record concludes that MLFF releases from the Dam destroy or adversely modify nearshore habitat." Thus the court invalidated FWS’s attempt to approve Dam operation because it ignored the past decade of science documenting the destruction of native fish habitat. The court gave federal officials five months to fix the problem.
“The court found that the federal government has refused to take action to protect the native fish habitat downstream," said Earthjustice attorney McCrystie Adams. "The court told the federal agencies to rework their dam operating plans to make them consistent with what science tells us is needed to protect the fish. The dam needs to be run in a way that restores the native fish of one of America’s most treasured rivers and landscapes.”
Humpback chub have plied the muddy waters of the Colorado River for four million years. Threats to the survival of humpback chub and their native river ecosystem arise mainly from the many dams on the Colorado River and its tributaries. In Grand Canyon, the primary culprit is Glen Canyon Dam, located just upstream of the Canyon. This dam has tamed the once wild river, initiating a cascade of environmental changes that has already wiped out some native species and has seriously reduced the populations of humpback chub. Sandy beaches, once replenished every year with sediment carried during flood flows, are eroding to bedrock and eliminating native streamside habitats. Water released through the Glen Canyon Dam in uneven pulses tends to destroy the streamside sand bars and banks that help create chub habitat.
“The court simply validated what the scientists have been saying for over thirteen years -- Dam operations destroy chub habitat in Grand Canyon National Park -- yet Reclamation continues to ignore what has been apparent for years,” said Neil Levine, Grand Canyon Trust’s attorney. “It is time for Reclamation to act responsibly when it comes to protecting one of this Nation's great natural treasures.”
Grand Canyon Trust protects and restores the canyon country of the Colorado Plateau. For more information and background, visit www.grandcanyontrust.org.
Earthjustice works through the courts to safeguard public lands, national forests, parks, and wilderness areas; to reduce air and water pollution; to prevent toxic contamination; and to preserve endangered species and wildlife habitat. Visit www.earthjustice.org.
Press Release Archive
May 8, 2009
Suit Challenges New Uranium Exploration That Threatens the Grand Canyon
May 5, 2009
Bureau of Land Management Defies Congressional Uranium Ban, Approves New Exploration North of Grand Canyon
April 24, 2009
Environmentalists and Industry Join Forces in Nation’s Largest Comprehensive Forest Restoration Effort
April 6, 2009
San Juan Power Plant Runs Cleaner, But Pollution Reductions at Risk
January 22, 2009
Legislation Introduced to Protect Grand Canyon From Uranium Threat and Override Bush Midnight Regulation
December 4, 2008
Bush Administration Withdraws Rule Protecting Grand Canyon From Uranium Mining
September 29, 2008
Conservation Groups Challenge Kempthorne to Protect Grand Canyon
September 2008
Settlement Repeals Uranium Exploration Near Grand Canyon
June 2008
Emergency Resolution to Protect Grand Canyon
April 2008
Uranium Mine Exploration Near Grand Canyon Halted
March 2008
Conservation Groups Challenge Uranium Mine Exploration Near Canyon
December 7, 2007
Glen Canyon Dam Operations Challenged
December 29, 2005
Mohave Owners Choose To Shut Power Plant - Pollution Stops on New Year’s Day October 13, 2005
Congressional
Hearing Examines Health of Southwest National Parks
September 28, 2005
Historic
Kane and Two Mile Ranches Bought by the Grand
Canyon Trust and The Conservation Fund
August 5, 2005
BLM to Sell Leases Within Eyeshot of Canyonlands National Park
June 13, 2005
Grand Canyon Trust Sparks Discussion of Drought Solutions
May 27, 2005
Grand Canyon Trust Endorses Utah Recreational Land Exchange Act of 2005
May 5, 2005
Bush Administration Revokes Roadless Area Protections
April 6 , 2005
Toxic Tailings To Be Removed From Banks Of Colorado River
March 10, 2005
Grand Canyon Trust Sierra Club - San Juan Power Plant To Cut Air Pollution
August 15, 2004
Private Partnership Creates Model to Balance Wildlife Habitat and Working Ranchland Conservation
April 29, 2004
San Juan Power Plant Charged With More Clean Air Act Violations
April 14, 2004
Colorado River Tops 2004 "Most Endangered" List
February 5, 2004
Court Rules Against PNM In Air Pollution Case
|